JANKI KUSHWAHA v. VIJAY PRAKASH SINGH KUSHWAHA AND 2 OTHERS
A227/13809/2026 · 2026-09-30
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10323 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10323 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13809 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction upon learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 10, Allahabad to decide 6-C application dated 29.04.2023 filed in Case No. 397 of 2023.
2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the temporary injunction application 6-C dated 29.04.2023, in case, the same is pending consideration in Case No. 397 of 2023, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
3. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 1, 2026 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harsh Tripathi, Vivek Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Janki Kushwaha .....Petitioner(s) Vijay Prakash Singh Kushwaha And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad