Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10322 (ALL)

KUMUD KUMARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/15944/2026 · 2026-09-29

Siddharth Nandan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15944 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard Shri Ritesh Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for regularization on the post of Principal and it has been stated that he has been working as an adhoc Principal for more than 5 years and is fully eligible and qualified for being regularized. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Director of Education (Secondary) vide its letter dated 10.07.2019 had sought details of such employees from all the District Inspector of Schools and in pursuance, thereafter she has also submitted her details but till date no action has been taken. He further submits that in a similar circumstances, this Court vide order dated 06.07.2026 passed in Writ-A No.8785 of 2026 (Harvindra and 4 others vs. State of U.P. and others) has directed the respondents to consider the grievance of the petitioner; and petitioner, herein, is also entitled to the same relief. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, in case the petitioner files a detailed representation, the same shall be considered. 5. In view of the aforesaid, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the aforesaid writ petition pending and by the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the admission stage, directing the petitioner to file a representation before the respondent no.2 within 7 days Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ritesh Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kumud Kumari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) from today, along with the certified copy of this order; and in the event such a representation is filed by the petitioner within the said period, it is expected that the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of next 3 months. 6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed off. September 30, 2026 piyush WRIA No. 15944 of 2026 2 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad