Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1032 (KAR)

SRI K AHAMMAD v. SRI K MOHAMMAD SHAREEF

MFA/10735/2013 · 2026-02-24

P Sree Sudha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11438 MFA No. 10735 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 10735 OF 2013 (MV- D) BETWEEN: 1. SRI K AHAMMAD S/O ISMAIL AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT PARNEER KATTE HOUSE KABAKA VILLAGE PUTTUR TALUK D K DISTRICT - 574 201. 2. SMT AJIRA W/O SRI K AHAMMAD AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT PARNEER KATTE HOUSE KABAKA VILLAGE PUTTUR TALUK D K DISTRICT - 574 201. …APPELLANTS (A1 AND A2 ARE ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI K MOHAMMAD SHAREEF S/O LATE P S ABDUL KHADAR AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT KASTHOORY NIVAS KULA VILLAGE Digitally signed by PRIYANKA H M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11438 MFA No. 10735 of 2013 BANTWAL TALUK D K - 574 279. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER THE ORIENTAL ASSURANCE CO LTD NO.44/ANANTH COMPLEX N H 4, PEENYA 1ST STAGE TUMKUR ROAD BANGALORE - 560 058. 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER THE RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD MAXIOMUS COMMERCIAL COMPLEX 4TH FLOOR, LIGHT HOUSE ROAD HAMPANAKATTA MANGALORE - 575001. …RESPONDENTS (R1 AND R2 SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 30.03.2013 MADE IN MVC NO.1074/2010 BY THE PRLINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND M.A.C.T., PUTTUR, D.K., IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11438 MFA No. 10735 of 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL JUDGMENT This Court by order dated 06.01.2026 has observed that appellant No.1 died and in spite of service of notice to appellant No.2, he did not appeared. 2. Even after passing the conditional order on 06.01.2026, appellant No.2 has fails to evince any interest to pursue the litigation. This Court finds that there is no purpose is served in continuing the same. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41