Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10319 (UTT)

PRAMOOD KUMAR v. NATHIRAM

WPMS/38/2023 · 2026-08-10

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010001652023 2026:UHC:7058 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/38/2023 Pramood Kumar --Petitioner Versus Nathiram --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Anshu Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner through video conferencing. 2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief: “Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to set-aside the impugned order dated 5/08/2022 passed in The First appeal no. 148 of 2021 Pramod Kumar & others Vs. Nathiram & others, In The Court of Additional District Judge, Laksar, by which the Delay condonation application under section 5 of limitation Act has been dismissed and to allow the delay condonation application and remand the abovementioned first appeal to be heard on merits.” 3. Mr. Anshu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parties have entered into a settlement, therefore, petitioner do not want to press this writ petition and he may be permitted to withdraw the same. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 10.08.2026 Mahinder UKHC010001652023 2026:UHC:7058