2026:JHHC:7194 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 2119 of 2026 1.Pritam Kujur, aged about 18 years, son of Anil Ku jur, R/o Village Balakhataga, PO+PS-Ghaghra, District-Gumla 2. Vivek Bakhla @ Vivek Baxla, aged about 22 years, S/o late Bishram Baxla, Resident of Village+PO Gamhariya, PS-Ghaghra, District-Gumla ... … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Swapnil Anand, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, APP -------- Order No. 02 /Dated: 17th March 2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioners for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 310(2) of the BNS in connection with S.T No. 108 of 2025 arising out of Senha PS Case No. 35 of 2025 corresponding to GR No. 229 of 2025. In this case, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioners under Sections 310(2)/317(3) of the BNS. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter relates to dacoity and the petitioners are not named in the FIR. He submits that alleged recovery of ornaments such as Payal is general and omnibus allegation and the petitioners have not been identified in the Test Identification Parade and they have been remanded in this case on the basis of earlier case. The petitioners are in custody since 29.04.2025 as such, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners. 5. Having regard to the fact that the petitioners have been 2026:JHHC:7194 2 remanded in this case on the basis of earlier case in which they have already been granted bail coupled with the fact that they have not been identified in the T.I.P and they are in custody since 29.04.2025, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, above-named are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge- II, Lohardaga in connection with S.T No. 108 of 2025 arising out of Senha PS Case No. 35 of 2025 corresponding to GR No. 229 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial Court and they shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against the above-named petitioners, learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the above-named petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands allowed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 17th March 2026 Amit Uploaded on 19/03/2026