Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10316 (UTT)

SAMRAT PRITHVIRAJ CHAUHAN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY v. UNION OF INDIA

WPMS/1546/2020 · 2026-08-19

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010088102020 2026:UHC:7498 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/1550/2020 Samrat Prithviraj Chauhan Institute of Nursingh and Paramedical Science --Petitioner Versus Union of India and others --Respondents With WPMS/1546/2020 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. No representation for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Mohan and Mr. Chandra Shekhar Joshi, Brief Holder for the State. 2. Since common questions of facts and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, these are being heard and decided together. However, for the sake of brevity and convenience, facts of Writ Petition (MS) No. 1550 of 2020, alone are being considered and discussed. 3. Reliefs sought by petitioner in WPMS No. 1550 of 2020 are as follows: “i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to enhance the 10% seats of B.Sc. Nursing and G.N.M. Diploma under Economically Weaker Section (EWS) Scheme in his institute as per the minutes/guidelines issued by All India Council of Technical Education (AICTE). UKHC010088102020 2026:UHC:7498 ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of the mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to enhance the 10% seats of Pharmacy under Economically Weaker Section (EWS) Scheme in his college and give him approval under the law.” 4. The reliefs as claimed cannot be granted in a writ petition. If petitioner has any grievance, then he shall be at liberty to approach the competent authority by making representation. 5. With the aforesaid observation, both the writ petitions stand disposed of. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 19.08.2026 Mahinder