Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10316 (PNJ)

RAKESH KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/55454/2025 · 2026-01-27

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE 245 Rakesh Kumar State of Punjab and CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Mr. for Mr. Ms. Mr. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The Bharatiya Nagarik respondent No.4 respondents No.5 by calling him time 2. Learned that the present present case already 3. In having been rendered 4. Pending 27.01.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-55454 Date of decision: VERSUS and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD Mr. Yadwinder Singh, Advocate (through the petitioner. Mr. Rituraj Singh, DAG, Punjab. Ms. Shalini Singh, Advocate for Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate for respondent ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for seeking No.4 to not conduct multiple enquires No.5 & 6 against the petitioner and time and again in respect of said complaint. Learned counsel appearing on behalf present petition has been rendered infructuous already stands registered. view of the above, the present rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall (VINOD speaking/reasoned : Yes/No reportable : Yes/No PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 55454-2025(O&M) decision: 27.01.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ (through V.C.) respondent No.5 & 6. filed under Section 528 of the seeking directions to official enquires on the complaint filed by and not to harass the petitioner complaint. behalf of the petitioner contends infructuous since FIR in the present petition is disposed of as shall also stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.01.29 14:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document