HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4380 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State. 2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "(i) issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus to directing the court below i.e. respondent no.2 to decide the Revision No. 136 of 2025 being Computer No. AG2025015000136 (Narayan Versus Govind and others) under Revision no. 79 of 2025 being computer no. AG202501500079 under section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before him within a stipulated period." 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the revision filed before respondent no.2 is pending consideration since 2025, which is being unnecessarily adjourned without any justifiable reasons. In view of the provisions of Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, the revision or appeal filed before the Board of Revenue or the Commissioner is required to be decided within a period of six months from the date of its registration, but no efforts are being made to decide the revision, expeditiously, so a direction may be issued to hear the parties and decide the revision, within a stipulated time frame. 4. In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction upon the respondent no.2 to decide the pending revision, as noticed above, by passing appropriate order, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of six months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. September 30, 2026 Anil Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jay Prakash Singh, Shashi Kant Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Arun Kumar,J.) Govind .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad