Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10311 (AP)

N.G.REDDY v. THE SRI KALAHASTI COOP.TOWN BANK LTD.

WP/17299/2002 · 2026-09-17

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010209452002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No: 17299/2002 Between: 1. N.G.REDDY, - ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SRI KALAHASTI COOP TOWN BANK LTD, - ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 21711 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 306 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2003(WPMP 24568 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Bank to pay all the retirement benefits such as gratuity, Provident Fund accumulations, encashment of earned and subsistence allowance for the period of suspension. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K S GOPALA KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent: 1. V SUDHAKAR REDDY 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri P.V.Raghuram, learned counsel representing Sri K.S.Gopala Krishnan, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, submits that he will withdraw the writ petition, with a liberty to approach the appropriate forum. Sri V.Sudhakar Redy, learned counsel for the respondents not raised any objection. In view of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum. With this observation, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 18.09.2026 PSK 4 43 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No: 17299/2002 Date: 18.09.2026 W PSK