Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10310 (BOM)

NAGO KALU BHOIR THROU. POA DNYANESHWAR N SALUNKE v. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER ULHASNAGAR SUB DIVISION ULHASNAGAR AND ORS

WP/12075/2026 · 2026-09-17

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.12075 OF 2026 Nago Kalu Bhoir .... Petitioner Vs. Sub-Divisional Officer & Ors. .... Respondents Mr. Suyas Gadre, Advocate for Petitioner. Y.D. Patil, AGP for State. CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 17th September 2026 P.C. : 1. Learned AGP submits that an alternate remedy is available to the Petitioner to challenge the impugned order before the Hon’ble Minister by filing a Revision Petition. 2. In view of the submission made by the learned AGP, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present Petition, with liberty to challenge the impugned order before the Hon’ble Minister. 3. Learned AGP fairly submitted that the Appeal would not be heard for a period of three weeks. 1/2 9 WP 12075.2026.doc Dusane 4. The time spent in pursuing the present proceedings be excluded while computing the period of limitation for filing the Revision Petition before the Minister. 5. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ] 2/2 9 WP 12075.2026.doc Dusane