2026:HHC:5717 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Exe. Pt. No. 133 of 2024 Decided on : 05.03.2026 Smt. Veena Devi …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a Special Leave Petition has been preferred by the State in the matter and the judgment in issue has been stayed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. 2. Accordingly, as prayed for, these proceedings are closed, but with liberty to the petitioner to file an application for revival of the proceedings, in case, need so arises in future. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:5717 Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 05, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)