Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10309 (UTT)

SMT. KISHANLATA v. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED

WPMS/1602/2020 · 2026-08-19

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010090722020 2026:UHC:7494 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/1602/2020 Smt. Kishanlata --Petitioner Versus Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Nitin Kamal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Himanshu Pal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.K. Papnoi, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Shailendra Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the respondent. 2. Mr. Nitin Kamal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Himanshu Pal, Advocate appearing for the petitioner makes statement at the bar that writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 3. In view of the statement so made, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 19.08.2026 Mahinder