SMT. KISHANLATA v. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED
WPMS/1602/2020 · 2026-08-19
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10309 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10309 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
UKHC010090722020
2026:UHC:7494 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/1602/2020
Smt. Kishanlata --Petitioner Versus Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited --Respondent
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Nitin Kamal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Himanshu Pal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.K. Papnoi, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Shailendra Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the respondent.
2. Mr. Nitin Kamal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Himanshu Pal, Advocate appearing for the petitioner makes statement at the bar that writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
3. In view of the statement so made, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 19.08.2026 Mahinder