UMA PACHAURI W/O SHRI KAILASH CHAND PACHAURI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/237/2026 · 2026-07-20
Mahendar Kumar Goyal, Ravi Chirania
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10309 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10309 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:27645-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 237/2026 URN: HC / 653U / 2026 Uma Pachauri W/o Shri Kailash Chand Pachauri, Age About 75 Years, Resident Of 61/23, Rajat Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302020. ----Petitioner/Complainant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Police
Commissioner,
Police
Commissionerate, Government Hostel, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Deputy Commissioner Of Police (South), Jaipur South, Police Commissionerate, Jaipur.
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Mansarovar, Jaipur South, Varun Path, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302020. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Mr. Aman Agarwal Ms. Neha Goyal Mr. Vinod Sharma Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P. Mr. Sattar Ali, ASI, P.S. Ramganjmandi, District Kota HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Judgment / Order 20/07/2026 Pursuant to order of this Court dated 18.07.2026, learned Government Advocate cum Additional Advocate General has submitted the status report dated 19.07.2026 furnished by the
[2026:RJ-JP:27645-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-237/2026] Deputy Superintendent of Police, Circle Ramganjmandi, District Kota Rural. As per the report, Ms. "S.S."-daughter of the petitioner was never taken in illegal detention/custody rather, was called for investigation. It is further stated that she has been and is with her family members. None for the petitioner even in the second round. Taking into consideration the contents of the status report dated 19.07.2026, we do not find it to be a case of illegal detention. Resultantly, this habeas corpus petition is dismissed.
(RAVI CHIRANIA),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J 43/Manish