Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10309 (KAR)

SRI MUNEGOWDA N v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/3065/2026 · 2026-03-02

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12621 WP No. 3065 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 3065 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUNEGOWDA N S/O NARAYANAPPA N.B, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT: NO.1097, 15TH B CROSS, NEAR CHIKKABOMMASANDRA CIRCLE, B SECTOR, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 064. 2. SRI. CHANNAKRISHNAPPA, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDING AT: NO.726, 9TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND BLOCK, 1ST STAGE, HBR LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 043. SENIOR CITIZENSHIP FEE RELAXATION NOT CLAIMED …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHARAN N MAJAGE.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12621 WP No. 3065 of 2026 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER, KHANIJA BHAVANA, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-2, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.14/3, 1ST FLOOR, CFC BUILDING, MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVAN, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HARISHA A.S.,AGA FOR R1; SRI. H L PRADEEP KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 12.12.2025 AND 11.12.2025 AS PER ANNX-E AND F AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12621 WP No. 3065 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER The petitioners have sought for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.3 to consider the representations at Annexures-E and F. 2. The petitioners have requested the Authority to disburse the compensation for the said extent of land as made out in the representation. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3 submits that the said applications/representations at Annexures-E and F would be considered and appropriate orders passed in accordance with law and as per legal entitlement of the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. Recording such undertaking of the learned counsel for the KIADB, petition is disposed of. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12621 WP No. 3065 of 2026 5. All the contentions on merits are kept open. 6. Needless to state, the petitioners to make out clarifications and furnish documents as may be required and the respondents are also at liberty to correspond with the Revenue Department, in the event any clarifications are required. Accordingly, petition is disposed of. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54