2026:JHHC:4875 Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11176 of 2025 --------- Khetro Mohan Hessa @ Natraj Hessa, Aged about 40 years, Son of Late Ganashyam Hessa, Resident of: Kope, Post Office-Patharmara, Police Station-Seraikella, District- Seraikella-Kharsawan, (Jharkhand) … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, Adv For the Opp. Party : Mr. Someshwar Roy, APP ---------- 03/Dated: 18th February, 2026 1. The instant application has been filed under Sections 483 and 484 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail in connection with Seraikella P.S. Case No.07 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 243 of 2025 (S.T. No. 93 of 2025) registered under Section 103(1) of B.N.S. pending in the court of learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Seraikella. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the brother of the informant with iron tool (Dhurmus) due to which the deceased received severe injuries and succumbed to injuries sustained to him in the hospital during treatment. 3. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that merely on the basis of the false allegation, the petitioner has been indulged in this present case. It has further 2026:JHHC:4875 Page | 2 been submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the seizure list does not bear the signature of the petitioner. In this case, the charge has already been framed on 07.07.2025 and out of the six charge-sheeted witnesses no witness has been examined till date. Furthermore, the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is languishing in jail custody since 25.01.2025. 4. While on the other hand, learned APP has appeared and opposed the prayer for bail stating that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner that he killed his brother by assault with Rammer Tool (Dhurmus) and the bloodstained rammer tool used in the crime was recovered by the police on the basis of confessional statement made by the petitioner. 5. This Court has heard the learned counsel for the parties, gone into the imputation made in the FIR as also gone into the case diary. 6. The allegation against the petitioner, as per the statement of the informant, is that on the issue of fencing of land, the petitioner attacked with the aid of Rammer Tool (Dhurmus) due to which the deceased sustained injuries and succumbed to death during treatment in the hospital. The tool used in the crime has also been recovered on the confessional statement of petitioner. 2026:JHHC:4875 Page | 3 Furthermore, the postmortem report also supports the prosecution version. It is a heinous crime in which allegedly assault is being made by the brother due to which he died. 7. This Court has taken into consideration the nature of crime which is heinous in nature, is of the view that the present application is not fit to be allowed. 8. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands rejected. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) 18th February, 2026 Alankar/-