Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10304 (JHR)

SARVJEET YADAV ALIAS SARAVJEET YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1464/2026 · 2026-03-18

Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7482 Page 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1464 of 2026 --------- Sarvjeet Yadav @ Saravjeet Yadav, aged about 34 years, son of Sankatha Prasad Yadav, resident of P.O.-Pahara, P.S.- Pandri, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh. … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Afaque Ahmad, Advocate : Mr. Akash Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, A.P.P. ----------- Order No.02/Dated: 18th March, 2026 1. The instant application has been filed under Sections 483 and 484 of the BNSS, 2023 seeking therein direction to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail in connection with Baghmara P.S. Case No. 46 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 318(2), 336(2), 338, 340(2), 3(5) and 61(2)(a) of BNS, pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Dhanbad. 2. Mr. Afaque Ahmad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, has submitted that out of aforesaid Sections, save and except Section 338 of B.N.S., 2023, all the other Sections are bailable in nature. 3. It has further been submitted that there is no allegation of forgery of any document and the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 17.12.2025. 4. It has also been submitted that one of the co- accused, namely, Santosh Yadav, has been directed to be 2026:JHHC:7482 Page 2 enlarged on bail vide order dated 09.03.2026 passed in B.A. No.1135 of 2026. The copy of the aforesaid order is appended to the supplementary affidavit. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that it is, therefore, a fit case for regular bail. 6. While on the other hand, Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State, has opposed the prayer for bail but he has not disputed the fact that the co-accused has been directed to be enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court. 7. This Court has heard learned counsel for the parties. 8. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly, the nature of allegation as also the petitioner is in judicial custody since 17.12.2025 and further one co-accused, namely, Santosh Yadav, has been directed to be enlarged on bail vide order dated 09.03.2026 passed in B.A. No.1135 of 2026, the petitioner named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Dhanbad in connection with Baghmara P.S. Case No. 46 of 2024, on the condition that the applicant will submit self-attested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and also submit his mobile number before 2026:JHHC:7482 Page 3 the learned trial court which he will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) Date : 18.03.2026 Birendra/-