19-WP-11348-2026 (C).doc Mayur IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11348 OF 2026 Vinayak Suryakant More ...Petitioner Versus The Commissioner Of Thane Municipal ...Respondent ... Adv. Raju M. Yamgar, i/b Adv. Rajesh D. Kakad, for the Petitioner. Adv. Mandar Limaye, for the Respondent-TMC. Adv. Neha S. Bhide, G.P., a/w Adv. K.B. Dighe, Addl. G.P., Adv. S.P. Kamble, AGP, for Respondent-State. ... CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. DATE : 22nd SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C.: 1. The instant Writ Petition has been preferred with the grievance that the Respondents have carried out the alleged demolition in an arbitrary manner, without according any opportunity to the Petitioner as required under the law. 2. Per contra, learned counsel for the Respondents submits that pursuant to the Notice dated 10th July 2026, the proceedings in regard to the subject issue, have already been finalized by the Respondent – Corporation and the construction in question has been demolished. As such, nothing survives in the Writ Petition. 1/2 MAYUR KONDIRAM ADANE Digitally signed by MAYUR KONDIRAM ADANE Date: 2026.09.23 11:19:36 +0530 19-WP-11348-2026 (C).doc He, however, submits that whatever rights are admissible, the same may be pressed before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. 3. Considering the aforesaid factual situation, the Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous. 4. We leave it open to the Petitioner to claim/press appropriate relief before the Competent Authority in accordance with law. 5. This Court has not adjudicated upon or expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. 6. With the aforesaid leave, the Writ Petition stands Disposed of. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] 2/2