Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1030 (UTT)

JAKIR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA2/97/2025 · 2026-01-03

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:83 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA2 No. 97 of 2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Sushil Kumar, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. This is the second bail application moved on behalf of the present applicant, namely, Jakir, S/o Tahir seeking bail in relation to FIR dated 01.01.2025, bearing FIR/Case Crime No. 0001 of 2025 registered at P.S. Piran Kaliyar District Haridwar, wherein the applicant along with one Irshad have been implicated for the offences punishable under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. 4. The first bail application was rejected by this Court on 20.03.2025. 5. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that in all the previous cases on the basis of which the applicant has been implicated he has already been enlarged on bail and in the present case applicant is languishing in jail since 01.01.2025 and almost one year has been passed. 6. On the other side, Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Addl. Advocate General for the State have not disputed this fact, that the present applicant is in custody since 01.01.2025 and in previous cases on the basis of which the applicant has been implicated he has already enlarged on bail. 7. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the applicant already admitted to bail in the previous cases and in the present one the applicant 2026:UHC:83 is languishing in jail since 01.01.2025, this Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves for bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the instant second bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant “Jakir” be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 10. It is made clear that after being released on bail, the applicant shall report to the nearest Police Station, on the second day of every month and concerned SHO shall record his presence, failing which the prosecution is free to move an application for cancellation of bail. Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 03.01.2026 Nahid 2026:UHC:83