Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10296 (KAR)

SRI S K MOHAN KUMAR v. CANARA BANK

WP/8851/2026 · 2026-04-08

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19409 WP No. 8851 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 8851 OF 2026 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI S.K.MOHAN KUMAR SON OF LATE SRI KRISHNA REDDY S.V. AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.367, SINGANAYAKANAHALLU YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU – 560 064 2. SRI S.K.SUNIL KUMAR SON OF LATE SRI KRISHNA REDDY S.V., AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.367, SINGANAYAKANAHALLU YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU – 560 064 3. SMT. N.PREMA WIFE OF LATE SRI KRISHNA REDDY S.V., AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.367, SINGANAYAKANAHALLU YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU – 560 064 …PETITIONERS (BY SMT.BHAGYA SUBHASH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NEERAJ RAJIV SHIVAM, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19409 WP No. 8851 of 2026 AND: CANARA BANK NELAMANGALA BRANCH NANDAGOKULA BUILDING FIRST FLOOR, OPP. SHELL PETROL BUNK VINAYAKANAGARA NELAMANGALA - 562 123 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT QUASHING THE NOTICE BEARING NO.CB/0445/SARFAESI/ DN/SVKR/2025-26/1 DATED 09.01.2026 (ANNEXURE-A) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19409 WP No. 8851 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner’s seeking withdrawal of the petition to avail appropriate remedy before the DRT. The memo is taken on record. In view of the same, this court is passing the following: ORDER i. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ii. The petitioner shall avail the benefit under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. iii. Pending I.As., in the petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47