HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 35689 of 2026 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Mr. Vishnu Kant Tiwari, learned Counsel for the applicants, Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Mishra, learned Counsel holding brief of Mr. Dev Kant Tiwari, learned Counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 2. The present application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicants with the following prayer: "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this application and to quash the Charge sheet Dated 10.12.2023, Cognizance Order dated 05.02.2024, in Crl. Case No. 112/2024 (State of UP Vs. Amit Niranjan and others), under section 498-A, 354-A, 323, 504, 506, 427 IPC, 3/4 D.P. Act, passed by Judicial Magistrate, Konch, District- Jalaun, Arising out of Case Crime No. 205/2023 Police station- Konch, District Jalaun along with the entire criminal proceeding of the Crl. Case No. 112/2024 (State of UP Vs. Amit Niranjan and others), in view of the compromise dated 14.05.2026, settled between the parties." 3. Learned Counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants and opposite party no.2 have compromised the dispute. It is further argued that the said compromise has also been verified by the concerned Trial Court, as such the proceedings against the applicants may be quashed. 4. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 admitted the fact of compromise and stated that he has no objection if the proceeding of the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vishnu Kant Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit Niranjan And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) aforesaid case is quashed against the applicants. 5. From the perusal of the record it is apparent that parties have entered into compromise and have settled their dispute amicably. 5. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed. 6. Upon perusal of the records and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject, this is a fit case for exercising powers of this Court to quash the proceedings, as prayed for by the applicants. 7. The entire proceedings of the aforesaid case, insofar as the present to the present applicants, are hereby quashed. 8. The present application is allowed. September 28, 2026 Vijay NA528 No. 35689 of 2026 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad