Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10292 (MAD)

Anbarasu@ Inba v. The State Rep by the Inspector of Police

CRL OP/9707/2026 · 2026-04-17

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.9707 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.9707 of 2026 Anbarasu @ Inba S/o.Om Prakash ... Petitioner Vs. The State rep. By its The Inspector of Police, H-5, New Washermenpet Police Station, Chennai. … Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with S.C.No.247 of 2024 on the file of Hon’ble XV Additional Judge at Singaravellalar Malligai, Chennai in Crime No.236 of 2023 on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Padmanabhan For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.02.2026 for the alleged offence under Sections 142, 148, 302 of IPC in Crime No.236 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.9707 of 2026 2. According to the prosecution, the petitioner along with other accused persons, joined together to commit the murder of the de-facto complainant’s husband. Hence, the present case has been registered. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 13.02.2026 and he is ready to co-operate with the investigation and abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner. 4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police reiterated the prosecution and submitted that this a case of the year 2003; NBW was ordered on 03.01.2026, whereas the petitioner was able to be secured only on 13.02.2026 and that now the case is posted for examining of L.W.1. He further submitted that the petitioner has three previous cases. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the totality of the circumstances of the case and on the fact that the petitioner has three previous cases, this Court is of the view that, it is not an appropriate time to consider this bail application. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.9707 of 2026 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 17.04.2026 mp To 1. The Inspector of Police, H-5, New Washermenpet Police Station, Chennai. 2. The XV Additional Judge, Singaravellalar Malligai, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.9707 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. mp Crl.OP.No.9707 of 2026 17.04.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis