ARVIND SAROJ AND 3 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF U.P AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/20144/2026 · 2026-09-30
Devendra Singh I, Rajiv Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10291 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10291 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20144 of 2026 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State, S.M.A. Abdy, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and perused the record.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to file fresh with better particulars.
3. Learned AGA for the State as well as learned counsel for the respondent no.4 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
5. Certified copy of the relevant documents, if any, be returned back to learned counsel for the petitioners as per Rules. October 1, 2026 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girja Shanker Mishra, Pratiksha Rai, Vinayak Varma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhishek Gupta, Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, G.A., Sapna Prajapati, Syed Mohammad Abbas Abdy (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Arvind Saroj And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad