CRWP-3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 113 PALAK YADAV STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA BATRA 1. Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No. petitioners at the hands of respondents No. representation dated 2. submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 01.04.2026 before the (Annexure P but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would b satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2 Superintendent of Police, Dabwali, District Sirsa 3844-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH PALAK YADAV AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE **** Mr. Surendra Pant, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana Mr. Mandeep Malik, Advocate for respondent No.4 MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No. representation dated 01.04.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 2026 before the Superintendent of Police, (Annexure P-3) raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would b satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2 Superintendent of Police, Dabwali, District Sirsa IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3844-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 ...Petitioners Versus AND OTHERS ...Respondents . JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana Mr. Mandeep Malik, Advocate for respondent No.4 The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 and 5 and to take action on their .2026 (Annexure P-3). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on of Police, Dabwali, District Sirsa ) raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would b satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2 Superintendent of Police, Dabwali, District Sirsa to decide the aforesaid .2026 ...Petitioners ...Respondents of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the and to take action on their At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on Dabwali, District Sirsa ) raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2- to decide the aforesaid AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.07 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-384 representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. 3. 4. of the respondents course. Let a complete set of course of the day. 5. which is taken on record. 6. commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No aforesaid representation dated within a period of accordance with law. respondent Nos.4 and 5 disposal of the representation. petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life and liberty. 07.04.2026 Amit Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 3844-2026 (O&M) (2) representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her course of the day. Power of Attorney on behalf of which is taken on record. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No aforesaid representation dated 01.04.2026 (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. The respondent No.2 shall ensure presence of the respondent Nos.4 and 5 who are parents of petitioner No.1, at the time of disposal of the representation. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life and liberty. .04.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. Haryana has advance notice on behalf State and submits that the needful will be done in due the paperbook be supplied to her during the Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent No.4 has been filed, In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners from today, by passing a speaking order in The respondent No.2 shall ensure presence of the who are parents of petitioner No.1, at the time of Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No on behalf State and submits that the needful will be done in due during the respondent No.4 has been filed, In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is .2 to decide the ) of the petitioners from today, by passing a speaking order in The respondent No.2 shall ensure presence of the who are parents of petitioner No.1, at the time of Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.07 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.