[2026:RJ-JP:27198] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10917/2026 URN: CRLMB / 20225U / 2026 Anish S/o Kasam, Aged 35 Years, R/o Roshan Ka Bas, Tan Baghoda, Police Station Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal-Tijara. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Teeka Ram Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 16/07/2026 1. This instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner against the order dated 14.05.2026 passed by learned trial Court under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 142/2026 registered at Police Station Khairthal, District Khairthal-Tijara for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2) & 351(3) of BNS, in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 303(2) & 351(3) of BNS and Sections 5 & 8 of The Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 1995. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has already been filed. He submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; that [2026:RJ-JP:27198] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10917/2026] co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail; conclusion of trial may take considerable time, and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and submits that nine criminal antecedents are registered against the accused-petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contentions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties; particularly keeping in view the fact that accused- petitioner is in custody since 04.05.2026; that charge-sheet has been filed; that co-accused persons Nandu @ Samaydeen and Vakeel @ Ratiya have been enlarged on bail by the trial Court itself vide order dated 03.07.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application Nos. 7760/2026 and 9683/2026; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Anish S/o Kasam is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:27198] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10917/2026] 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall his mark presence 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station till the completion of trial. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 77/EKTA