Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10287 (ALL)

MEERA CHAUHAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/16148/2026 · 2026-09-30

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16148 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. By means of present writ petition, petitioners have prayed for decision on their representations dated 23.07.2026 and 24.07.2026 seeking for regularization of their service. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that as petitioners have already represented, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate that respondent be directed to consider the grievance of the petitioners in accordance with law. 3. In view of these facts, respondent No. 1 is directed to consider and decide the representations dated 23.07.2026 and 24.07.2026 of the petitioners in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. It is made clear that this court has not examined the matter on merits and the order shall be passed strictly in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. October 1, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Meera Chauhan And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad