k 1/1 29 wp 1785.17 as.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1785 OF 2017 Babibai Atmaram Patil & Anr. ....Petitioners V/S Nathuram Parshuram Patil & Ors. ....Respondents _________ Mr. Rahul Thakur for the Petitioners. Mr. Rajendra Khaire i/b Sagar A. Mane for Respondent No.1. __________ CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 21 SEPTEMBER 2026. P.C.: 1. The Petition challenges order dated 22 July 2015, rejecting Applications at Exhibits-24 and 25 under Order XXI Rule 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. By those Applications Petitioners had sought their impleadment in the execution proceedings contending that they are sisters of Decree-Holder No. 1. 2. It is well-settled position that impleadment cannot be permitted in respect of a Land Acquisition Reference. If any person is aggrieved by the award of compensation, he/she can file proceedings under the provisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 or a Suit for recovery of his/her share. The Executing Court was not expected to decide the claims of the Petitioners. Applications are rightly rejected. No interference is warranted in impugned orders. Writ Petition is accordingly rejected. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) katkam Page No. 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AS:38841 Signed by: Sudarshan R. Katkam Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 23/09/2026 11:16:40