[2026:RJ-JP:27338] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7863/2026 URN: CRLMB / 14376U / 2026 Neeraj Narwal S/o Rajulal @ Rajesh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Motar Garaj, Jhalawar, P.s. Kotwali Jhalawar, District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 17/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.273/2026 registered at Police Station Kotwali Jhalawar, District Jhalawar for offences under Sections 319(2) and 318(4) of BNS, 2023, Section 66(C) of IT Act and Section 42(3)(e) Telecommunications Act, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is that he has obtained a sim card based on documents which do not pertain to him. He contends that there is no allegation of forging any document. The petitioner has been in judicial custody since 10.05.2026. Though six criminal antecedents have been reported against the present [2026:RJ-JP:27338] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7863/2026] petitioner, he has already been acquitted in two of those cases. The case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Neeraj Narwal S/o Rajulal @ Rajesh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 24/Arun