Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10267 (AP)

ARAVA NAGA VENKATA RAMA RAO v. SRI NARASIMHA MURTHY

CC/1646/2026 · 2026-09-10

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010201732026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1646/2026 Between: 1. ARAVA NAGA VENKATA RAMA RAO, S/O. CHINA NAGESWARA RAO, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO.26-9-18, MEKAVARI STREET, BALUSUMUDI, BHIMAVARAM - 2, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, PIN - 534202. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI NARASIMHA MURTHY, ENGINEER - IN - CHIEF, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 520 002. 2. MS KEERTHI CHEKURI, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, PIN 533101. 3. SRI G SRINIVAS, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA, (DOWALESWARAM), EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, PIN - 533255. 4. SRI V V RAMA KRISHNA, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GODAVARI EASTERN DIVISION, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, PIN-533 125. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may 2 be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents for the willful and deliberate disobedience of the Order passed by this Hon'ble Court dt 07-11- 2025 in WP 29020 / 2025 in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the impugned order dated 07.08.2026 passed in C.C.No.1646 of 2026 in W.P.No.29020 of 2025 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the Respondent No.1 on 11.09.2026 in C.C.No.1646 of 2026 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MSVS SUDHA RANI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 2. T S RAYALU The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Ms. M.S.V.S. Sudha Rani, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders passed by this Court have been complied and requested this Court to close the contempt case. 2. Recording the same, this contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 11.09.2026 Gss