( 2026:JHHC:12449 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 93 of 2026 Asha Tiwari, Aadhar-949670860087, wife of Basant Tiwari, aged about 40 years, resident of CMPDI, Jatra Maidan, Misir Gonda, P.S. Gonda, P.O. Jawahar Nagar, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Rana Surjit Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Sudhansu Kr. Deo, Advocate 02/ 28.04.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Namkom P.S. Case No. 188 of 2025, registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 316 (2), 318(4), 352, 351 (2) and (3), 61 (2) BNS, pending in the Court of learned J.M, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the present case is counter blast of Gonda P.S. Case No. 64 of 2025 which has been lodged against the husband of informant and one Priyanka. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsels for the State and informant jointly oppose the prayer and submit that the petitioner in connivance with other accused persons have extorted Rs. 11.20 lacs from the husband of the informant. Learned counsel for the informant further submits that Khushi Tiwari in connivance with this petitioner extorted ornament worth Rs. 2.5 lacks from the husband of the informant. 5. Looking into contents of F.I.R, it transpires that petitioner happens to be mother of Khushi Tiwari and the petitioner in connivance with ( 2026:JHHC:12449 ) each other have extorted money by way of trapping innocent persons. In para 29 of the case diary it has come that the petitioner has criminal antecedent. In para 32 of the case diary it has come that during the period, several time, money has been transferred to the accused persons from the husband of the informant. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, her prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. Dt.28.04.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-