Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10266 (AP)

WATER USERS ASSOCIATION v. SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR

CC/3660/2022 · 2026-09-09

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010489032022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3660 OF 2022 Between: 1. WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, Munnelli tank, B.Kodur (M), YSR Kadapa Dist, Rep.by its President O.Raja Mohan Reddy ...Petitioner AND 1. SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR, The Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department, Secretariat,Velagapudi, Guntur. CAUSE TITLE AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED ON 29-03-2023 VIDE IA NO 1 OF 2023 IN CC NO 3660 of 2022 2. S S Rawat, The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat,Velagapudi, Guntur. 3. D Venkatramaiah, The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Kadapa Division, Y.S.R.Kadapa District. 4. A Venkatachalam, The Deputy Executive Officer, Irrigation Sub-division, Badvel, YSR Kadapa district ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the Contemnor herein for willfully 2 disobeying the orders of this Honourable High Court passed by His Lordship Sri Justice VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA in W.P.No. 11295/2022, dt.21-04-2022 in such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit to amend the Cause Title of the 1st contemnor is concerned by replacing the name of Shashi Bhushan Kumar in place of Anil Garg pending disposal of the above contempt case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: ASHOK RAM V Counsel for the Respondents:S SIVA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3660 OF 2022 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 21.04.2022 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.11295 of 2022. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 21.04.2022 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.11295 of 2022 and also furnished written instructions dated 10.09.2026 to that effect. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not refute the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents and requested to close the contempt case. 4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 10.09.2026 BSP 4 139 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3660 OF 2022 10.09.2026 BSP