Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10263 (JHR)

XX v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./510/2026 · 2026-03-30

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:8962 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.510 of 2026 ------ Durjodhan Yadav @ Duryodhan Yadav, aged about 25 years, son of Sarpanch Mahato @ Sarpanch Yadav, resident of Village Baijnathpur (buidhpahari), P.O. & P.S.-Narayanpur, District- Jamtara. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate : Mr. Sheo Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Ms. Vandana Bharti, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-30-03-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.58 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 77, 78, 79, 351(1) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 66 (D) (E) & 67A of the Information Technology Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner made half naked obscene photograph of the daughter of the informant viral and such photograph has been created by the petitioner and along with photograph, vulgar songs are also made viral. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that admittedly the petitioner is the son-in-law of the informant and he is having strained relationship with the daughter of the informant, hence, this false case has been foisted. It is next submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case and also undertakes to not to make any posting on any social media either in the name of the victim or anyone else. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 14.11.2025 as is evident from para-10 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.58 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case and will not make any posting on any social media either in his name or in the name of anyone else. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 30/03/2026 Abhiraj/