Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10263 (BOM)

GANGADHAR BANDU SANAP AND ANR v. VALMIK ANANDA SANAP SINCE DECEASED

IA/5613/2026 · 2026-09-22

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Renuka Thakur 9-IA-5613-2026.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5613 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 32001 OF 2025 Gangadhar Bandu Sanap and Anr. ...Applicants V/s. Valmik Ananda Sanap Since Deceased ...Respondent ________________ Mr. Rahul D. Motkari for Applicants Mr. Jayendra Khairnar for Respondent. ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED: 22 SEPTEMBER 2026. P.C.: 1) Interim Application is filed for restoration of the Second Appeal which is dismissed due to non-removal of office objections. 2) Mr. Khairnar, the learned counsel appearing for contesting Respondent fairly does not opposed the Application. 3) In view of averments made in the Application and with a view to provide an opportunity to the Appellants to prosecute the Appeal on merits, I deem it appropriate to restore the Appeal. Page No. 1 of 2 22 SEPTEMBER 2026 Renuka Thakur 9-IA-5613-2026.docx 4) Second Appeal is accordingly restored. 5) Interim Application is disposed of. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No. 2 of 2 22 SEPTEMBER 2026 Signed by: Renuka S Thakur Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 23/09/2026 11:46:11