Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1026 (RAJ)

RAJU @ RAJEEV S/O RAMCHANDRA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13017/2025 · 2026-03-17

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11184] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13017/2025 Raju @ Rajeev S/o Ramchandra, R/o Intka, Police Station Sikandra, District Dausa Rajasthan (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kolana Dausa) ---Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G L Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 17/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 290/2025 registered at Police Station Bandikui District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406 of IPC and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 of IPC dismissed the bail application before it. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant is 35 years of age and he is sole bread earner of the family. It is submitted that charge-sheet has been filed in the instant matter and that the matter is triable by Magistrate. It is submitted that the applicant is behind bars ever-since 06.09.2025. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has objected to the grant of bail. It is submitted that the applicant was closely [2026:RJ-JP:11184] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13017/2025] associated as submitted with the concerned Ministers and there are strong criminal antecedents, approximately eight, of similar nature whereby general public is looted, under the garb of grant of employment. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the overall facts and taking note of the fact that there are strong criminal antecedents, approximately eight, of similar nature registered against the applicant, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /7