Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1026 (JHR)

NAVEEN KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11732/2025 · 2026-03-11

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6392 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11732 of 2025 Naveen Kumar Singh, aged about 27 years, son of Rajeshwar Singh, resident of Nirmal Nagar, Majhi Tola, Post Adityapur, Police Station Adityapur, District Seraikella Kharsawan … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Ms. Ritu Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. V.S. Sahay, APP --- 03/11.03.2026 Heard Ms. Ritu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Heard Mr. V.S. Sahay, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party- State of Jharkhand. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 05.09.2025 in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No. 275 of 2025, registered under Sections 126(2)/127(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109(2)/324(4)/125(a)/125(b)/352/351(2)/ 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023, now pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has been named in the First Information Report, but in the CCTV footage, the petitioner is nowhere in picture. She has referred to paragraph 61 of the case-diary and has submitted that vivid description of the incident has been mentioned on the basis of CCTV footage but the petitioner has not been found in the footage. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer and has submitted that the petitioner has been named in the First Information Report at sl. No. (5) of paragraph 12 itself. 6. To this, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 05.09.2025 and the charge-sheet has already been submitted. 7. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and 2026:JHHC:6392 2 considering the aforesaid submissions and also the paragraph 61 of the case-diary with regard to CCTV footage and the custody of the petitioner since 05.09.2025, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No. 275 of 2025, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:11.03.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:11.03.2026