Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10258 (PAT)

Raman Kumar @ Raman Kumar Mandal v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./16810/2026 · 2026-05-06

Rajiv Roy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16810 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2024 Thana- ANTICHAK District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Raman Kumar @ Raman Kumar Mandal S/o Ram sagar Mandal Resident of Village/ Mohall - Ward No 4, Oriup, Police Station- Antichak, Distt.- Bhagalpur, Presently residing at sector 73A 138, Block- 35, Noida, Distt.- Gautam Budha Nagar, UP ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suman Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 06-05-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Antichak P.S. Case No. 45 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, lodged on 11.04.2024 by the informant Baijnath Mandal. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that his daughter failed to return in the evening and upon enquiry, the accused person including this petitioner have taken her away. This led to the F.I.R. 4. As the story unfolds, the girl returned and made her statement under section 183 of the BNSS and alleged that this petitioner took her away near a mountain and pressurized her for Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16810 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 marriage as she chose not to accept her demand, was allowed to return. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner tried to prove his innocence, learned APP Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh submits that the girl whose was taken away has already recorded her statement under section 183 BNSS supporting the prosecution story. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, no relief can be extended to the petitioner, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T