IN THE H M/S R.D. FOOD STATE OF HARY CORAM : HO HO Present : Mr Mr Mr DEEPAK SIBA Lea through this pet judgment of a D CWP-18967-20 Punjab and ano In disposed of, in Office (supra) 08.04.2026 Prince Whether speakin Whether reporta Sr. No.273 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH CWP-381 Date of D OD PRODUCTS Versus ARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Sr. Advocate w Mr. Mohit Bassi, Advocate for the p Mr. Sourabh Goel, Addl. A.G., Hary *** SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties are his petition is squarely covered in th of a Division Bench of this Court d 2020-Tecnimont SPA India Pr nd another. In the light of the above conse of, in terms of the judgment in Tecn pra). (DEEPAK JU (LAPITA JU speaking/reasoned : Yes/No reportable : Yes/No JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH 38158-2025 te of Decision : 08.04.2026 …PETITIONER …RESPONDENTS EPAK SIBAL PITA BANERJI te with the petitioner. Haryana. es are ad idem that the issue raised in the petitioner’s favour by the ourt dated 10.12.2024, passed in ia Project Office Vs. State of consensus, this petition is also Tecnimont SPA India Project EPAK SIBAL) JUDGE PITA BANERJI) JUDGE PRINCE SAINI 2026.04.09 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document