HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39853 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioner is a complainant and on his complaint an inquiry has been initiated and on basis of a preliminary inquiry a proper inquiry was setup under Section 95(1)(g) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act,which is still not concluded. 3. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of with an observation that concern respondent will take all necessary steps in pursuance of the report to expedite the further inquiry expeditiously. October 1, 2026 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dr. Akhilesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Krishna Kant Singh (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Ankit Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad