RAMESH MANDAL ALIAS RAMESH KUMAR MANDAL v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1022/2026 · 2026-03-16
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10250 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10250 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:6960
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ABA No.1022 of 2026
1. Ramesh Kumar Mandal @ Ramesh Mandal, aged about 21 years, son of Panchanand Mandal, resident of Village-Amaiyasar, P.O. & P.S.- Devipur, District-Deoghar.
2. Bishnu Kumar Mandal @ Bishnu Mandal, aged about 22 years, son of Arjun Mandal, resident of Village-Patharchapti, P.O.-Bhojpur, P.S.- Devipur, District-Deoghar.
…. Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
--------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Niranjan Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P. ------
2/16.03.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioners and
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Devipur P.S. Case No.128/2025 registered for alleged offence under 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 132, 121(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., at Deoghar.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegations are made against 15 to 20 persons for resisting the police force and making assault. He also submits that one Arjun Mandal was arrested by the police and he has disclosed the name of the petitioners. He next submits that petitioners are having no criminal antecedents as disclosed in paragraph 13 of the petition. He also submits in the impugned order of the learned Sessions Judge, it has come that there is no injury report available in the case diary.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of making assault.
2026:JHHC:6960
2
5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that the allegations are made against 15 to 20 persons of resisting the police, although the allegation of injury is there, however, no injury report was found in the case diary and that has come in the order of the learned Sessions Judge and further it has been pointed out that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph 13 of the petition, in that view of the matter, the petitioners above named are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioners on such terms and condition and sureties, the learned Court may deem fit and proper.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 16.03.2026 R.Kumar