Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1025 (PNJ)

JASWINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/3871/2026 · 2026-04-07

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-3871 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 110 JASWINDER KAUR STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA BATRA CRM-W- 1. CRWP-3871 1. Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No. petitioners at the hands of respondents No. representation dated 2. submitted that the petiti 20.03.2026 before the Superintendent of Police, raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon 3871-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH JASWINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE **** Mr. Bhavneet Singh, Advocate Mr. Amandeep Singh Punia, Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) -506-2026 The application is allowed as prayed for. 3871-2026 The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No. representation dated 20.03.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 2026 before the Superintendent of Police, raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3871-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners Versus AND OTHERS ...Respondents . JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Bhavneet Singh, Advocate Mr. Amandeep Singh Punia, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana The application is allowed as prayed for. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 8 and to take action on their .2026 (Annexure P-4). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has oners have recently filed a representation on 2026 before the Superintendent of Police, Dabwali (Annexure P raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further .2026 ...Petitioners ...Respondents The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the and to take action on their At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has oners have recently filed a representation on (Annexure P-4) raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has . He further AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.07 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-3871 submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions District Sirsa and take n 3. 4. behalf of the respondents due course. Let a complete set of course of the day. 5. commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid repre within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them order to protect their life and liberty. 07.04.2026 Amit Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 3871-2026 (O&M) -2- submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2 Sirsa to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 20.03.2026 (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them order to protect their life and liberty. .04.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate are issued to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana, has advance notice State and submits that the needful will be done in the paperbook be supplied to her during the In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-4) of the petitioners within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate Senior Superintendent of Police, to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners has advance notice on State and submits that the needful will be done in ng the In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the ) of the petitioners within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the adequate security in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.07 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.