Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10249 (UTT)

BHANU PRATAP KASHYAP v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DISTRICT UDHAM SINGH NAGAR

WPMS/2137/2020 · 2026-08-10

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010114892020 2026:UHC:7063 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2137/2020 Bhanu Pratap Kashyap --Petitioner Versus District Magistrate District Udham Singh Nagar and others --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. M.K. Ray, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Additional CSC for the State. 2. Mr. M.K. Ray, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes statement at the Bar that writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 10.08.2026 Mahinder