HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15032 of 2026 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel for respondents and Sri Nagendra Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. Present petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding and directing the Respondent Authorities to treat the appointment of the petitioners as regular appointment form the date of their initial appointment/joining and to pay regular pay scale, annual increment and others service benefit since the date of joining and to pay arrear of salary along with interest since then as possible at earliest. b) Issue a writ order or direction directing the Respondent no.2- District Basic Education Officer, Amroha to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within stipulated period as per fix by this Hon'ble Court. c) Issue a writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. d) Award the cost of Petition to the Petitioner." Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court passed in Writ-A No. 19352 of 2024 (Charan Singh and 7 others vs. State of U.P. and another), which was allowed vide order dated 6.12.2024 with a direction to treat the petitioner as regularly appointed Class-IV employees against substantive posts from the date of their initial appointment, considering the judgment of this Court in the case of Pradeep Kumar and 6 others vs. State of U.P. and others, passed in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamal Kumar Kesherwani Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Naresh Kumar Bhatnagar And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Writ-A No. 6717 of 2018. He lastly submits that in light of such facts as well as law laid down by this Court in the aforesaid cases, this petition may also be allowed on the same terms and conditions. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 as well as learned standing counsel could not disputed the aforesaid facts and fairly concede that the matter is squarely covered with the aforesaid judgments. The writ petition is accordingly allowed in terms of the law laid down by this Court in Charan Singh (supra) & Pradeep Kumar (supra) with the direction to treat the petitioners as regularly appointed Class-IV employees against the substantive post from the date of initial appointment as stated above. September 30, 2026 Jitendra/- WRIA No. 15032 of 2026 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad