HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39027 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and learned counsel for the contesting respondents are present. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not want to press the present writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed with the liberty to file a fresh petition. 3. Learned Standing Counsel as well as learned counsel for the contesting respondents have no objection in case the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. September 28, 2026 Sumit S Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Kumar Maurya, Vijaypal Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Aditya Bhushan Singhal, C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Rabal Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad