Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10241 (KAR)

SRI SHANKAREGOWDA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/7709/2025 · 2026-03-02

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12615 WP No. 7709 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 7709 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI SHANKAREGOWDA S/O LATE KENGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.11, KARIMARANAHALLI, BAGIVALU POST, ARASIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT- 573164 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA K B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANASOUDHA, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HASSAN. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HASSAN. Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12615 WP No. 7709 of 2025 4. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, NADAKACHERI, GANDASI, ARASIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT. 5. ANIMAL AND HUSBANDARY VETERINARY OFFICER, BIDAREKAVALU, GANDASI HOBLI, ARASIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, NADAKACHERI, GANDASI, ARASIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P.RADHA., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 13.12.2024 ISSUED BY THE R-4 AND R-5 IN NO.NA(GM) OTHUVARI CR.51/2024-25 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS 2, 3 AND 6 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 03.02.2025 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO MAKE DURASTHI WORK IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE LAND BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12615 WP No. 7709 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 02.03.2026 stating that after the present writ petition was filed, the respondent-Tahsildar has issued an endorsement dated 26.10.2025 and has also withdrawn the impugned notice. Therefore, it is submitted that the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL