Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:20408
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2143 of 2026 1 - Banshilal Son Of Salik Ram Aged About 65 Years Resident Of Village - Barhaguda Tahsil -Chandrapur, District -Sakti Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Secretary Department Of Food And Civil Supplies Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar New Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Divisional Officer Cum Land Acquisition Officer Dabhra District Sakti Chhattisgarh 5 – Tahsildar, Chandrapur District Sakti, Chhattigarh
... Respondents (Cause title as taken from CIS periphery) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Pranjal Agrawal, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. Anadi Sharma, Panel Lawyer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble
Mr.
Amitendra Kishore Prasad,
Judge
Order on Board 01/05/2026
1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking following RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.05.06 11:07:24 +0530
2 reliefs:-
“10.1 That this Hon'ble court kindly be pleased to direct the Respondents for correction of entries of paddy registration. 10.2 That this Hon'ble court kindly be pleased to direct the respondents for taking decision on representation within time frame.
10.3. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s land has been submerged in the ‘Kalma Baraj Project’, as such, the amount which has been deposited in his account as bonus for cultivating paddy is not in accordance with law; it has been granted to the petitioner due to non-correction of revenue records by the concerned Tahsildar, as such, the petitioner has filed this petition seeking relief that the concerned Tahsildar may be
directed to correct the revenue records deleting name of petitioner in revenue records, while correcting the entries of petitioner’s name in respect of land bearing Khasra No.980/4 (admeasuring area 0.14 acre) situated at Village Chandrapur, District-Sakti, as the petitioner has never sold any paddy.
3. Learned counsel for the Respondent/State submits that if any application of petitioner is pending, the same will be considered and decided as per law, expeditiously.
3
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the records enclosed along with the writ petition.
5. Considering the facts of the case, nature of relief and submissions of counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of directing the concerned Tahsildar to correct the revenue records while deleting name of petitioner in respect of land bearing khasra No.980/4 (admeasuring area 0.14 acre) situated at Village Chandrapur, District-Sakti (CG).
6. The petitioner is directed to refund the amount received by him towards bonus in respect of the aforesaid land, in the event such amount has been credited to his account. CC as per rules.
Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge
Rukhsar