Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10238 (JHR)

SUJATA BHAKAT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY DEPTT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY

WPC/722/2022 · 2026-04-22

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:11782 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 722 of 2022 ---------- Sujata Bhakat, aged about 30 years, daughter of Ashok Bhakat, R/o. village Uparbandha, P.O. Sudna, P.S. Musabani, Dist. East Sinbhghum, Jharkhand. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of School Education & Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, MDI Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Department of School Education & Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, MDI Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Govt. of Jharkhand, Kalinagar, Chaibagan, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The D.E.O., Dhatkidih, P.O. & P.S. Jamshedpur, Dist. East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. ………. Respondents. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rishu Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kumar Pawan, AC to SC(M)-III For the JSSC : M/s. Sanjoy Piprawall, Prince Kumar, Rakesh Ranjan, Jay Prakash, Advocates ---------- 11/ 22.04.2026 By way of present writ application petitioner has prayed for direction upon the respondents to consider her representation for considering her candidature in Graduate Trained Teachers in combined Graduate Teacher Competitive Exam., 2016, as the petitioner was declared successful in written examination conducted by the respondent-authorities. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instant application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach respondent No. 3, so that her grievance raised in the writ application can be redressed. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-JSSC submits that if the petitioner approaches the respondent No. 3, he shall look into the matter for redressing the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Having regard to the limited submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the 2026:JHHC:11782 2 petitioner to file fresh representation before the respondent No. 3. The moment the concerned respondent will receive any such representation; he shall take decision in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It goes without saying that if the decision is taken in favour of the petitioner, necessary consequential order be issued within a further period of four weeks. 6. As a result, the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 22nd April, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded 04.05.2026