OD-02 WPO/27/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Saraswati Devi Sonkar & Anr. Versus Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors. Before: The Hon’ble Justice RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY Date: 20th April 2026 Appearance: Mr. Mahim Sasmal, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee, Advocate Mr. Suman Basu Advocate for the KMC Ms. Susmita Chatterjee, Advovcate for the State The Court: 1. Complaining of inaction on the part of the municipal authorities to take steps in furtherance to the representation made by the petitioners on 18th January 2025, the instant writ petition has been filed. 2. The petitioners would complain that the private respondent has illegally set up a dala/stall in front of the petitioners’ premises being no. 111, Netaji Subhas Road, Ward – 42, Borough – V, Kolkata – 700001. The petitioners contend that previously the petitioners had moved before this Hon’ble Court seeking removal of the stall set up in front of the petitioners’ premises by a writ petition registered as WPO/661/2024, wherein the petitioners were permitted to make a fresh representation to 2 the Town Vending Committee of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation. According to the petitioners, the private respondent has shops elsewhere and notwithstanding the same, the private respondent has encroached upon the footpath in front of the petitioners’ premises. He submits that the Municipal Commissioner’s Circular No.07 of 2019-2020 dated 23rd April 2019 does not permit the persons who are shop owner to encroach upon the footpath. 3. Mr. Chatterjee, learned advocate appears for the municipal authorities. 4. Having heard the learned advocates representing the respective parties, I am of the view that since the petitioners have already made a representation dated 18th January 2025 in terms of the direction issued by this Court on 20th November 2024, the same should be disposed of by the municipal authorities after necessary inspection and enquiry to be made by the municipal authorities/Town Vending Committee, as regards the claim made by the petitioners. 5. It is made clear that under no circumstances the municipal authorities shall permit the private respondent to interfere with the egress and ingress of the petitioner’s premises. 6. The writ petition thus stands disposed of. (RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J.) R. Bose