TAHAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, THROUGH ARUN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT, RANCHI
WPC/7411/2025 · 2026-02-03
Rajesh Shankar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10230 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10230 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:2750-DB ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 7411 of 2025 ----
Tahal Consulting Engineers India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, having its registered office at Plot No. 34, Phase 2, 2nd Floor, Sector-44, Industrial Area, Gurgaon- 122003, Haryana through Arun Kumar, aged about 41 years, S/o. Ram Partap Sharma, R/o. Vill.- Garari, P.O. & P.S.- Bal Bihal, Dist.- Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh-176040
--- --- Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Drinking Water & Senitation Department, Ranchi, Jharkhand, Govt. Of Jharkhand having its office at P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, Dist.- Ranchi.
2. Engineer-in-Chief, Drinking Water & Senitation Department, Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at House No. 1, 6, Doranda Bazar, Resaldar Nagar, P.O. & P.S.- Doranda, Dist.- Ranchi, Jharkhand 834002.
3. Chief Engineer (CDO), Drinking Water & Senitation Department, Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at House No. 1, 6, Doranda Bazar, Resaldar Nagar, P.O. & P.S.- Doranda, Dist.- Ranchi, Jharkhand 834002.
4. Superintending Engineer, Drinking Water & Sanitation Department, Pakur Division, having its office at P.O., P.S. & Dist.- Pakur.
5. Executive Engineer, Drinking Water & Sanitation Department, Pakur Division, having its office at P.O., P.S. & Dist.- Pakur.
---
--- Respondents --- CORAM: Hon’ble The Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Shankar
---
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajit Kumar, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Shresth Gautam, Advocate
For the Resp. State: Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to A.G. ---
04 / 03.02.2026
After arguing this matter for some time, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse of various alternate remedies that are available to the petitioner.
2. We grant leave with liberty, as prayed for.
3. This petition is disposed of, as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.
4. All contentions of all parties are left explicitly open, since we have not examined the merits or demerits of the matter.
(M.S. Sonak, C.J)
(Rajesh Shankar, J)
February 03, 2026 R. Kr./Rahul Uploaded on-04.02.2026