RAGHVENDRA PRATAP SINGH ALIAS GHURAN SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.
BAIL/7620/2026 · 2026-04-19
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1023 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1023 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7620 of 2026 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.
1. Heard Sri Prakash Rai, learned Advocate, holding brief of Sri Rishi Kant Rai, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned Brief holder for the State. 2. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.235 of 2025, under Section 109 of BNS and Section 3/7, 25, 27 of Arms Act (corresponding section 307 IPC), Police Station Gadwar, District Ballia, during pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits, as per allegations, applicant along with co-accused Angad Kumar opened fire upon police party but admittedly none of the police personnel sustained injuries. 4. He next submits, apart from the present case, applicant is having criminal history of three other cases but out of three cases, two cases relates to Cow Slaughter Act and in both the cases, he is on bail. 5. He next submits, however, another case relates to Section 103 BNS i.e. murder and in this case, applicant, till date, could not be released on bail but merely on this ground considering the fact of the case, it is not proper to withhold his bail application. 6. He next submits, as applicant has been made an accused in the murder case, therefore, police implicated him in this case. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rishi Kant Rai, Sudhir Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raghvendra Pratap Singh Alias Ghuran Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. He further submits, in the present matter applicant is in jail since 12.10.2025 i.e. for the last more than six months. 8. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the argument on facts advanced by learned counsel for applicant. 9. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. 10. However, as per allegation, applicant and co-accused Angad Kumar opened fire on the police party but admittedly none of the police personal sustained any injuries. 11. Further, however, apart from the present case, applicant is having criminal history of three other cases including a case of murder but other two cases relates to Cow Slaughter Act and in both the cases, he is on bail.
Considering the fact that applicant has been made accused in a murder case, the reasons of false implication disclosed by the learned counsel for the applicant during the course of argument, in the instant matter , cannot be ruled out at this stage. 12. Further, in the present matter applicant is in jail since 28.12.10.2025 i.e. for the last more than six months. 13. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case discussed above, in my view, applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 14. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. 15. Let the applicant -Raghvendra Pratap Singh alias Ghuran Singh be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat BAIL No. 7620 of 2026 2
or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity. 16. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant. 17. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. April 20, 2026 Mini BAIL No. 7620 of 2026 3 (Sameer Jain,J.) Digitally signed by :- MINI KANAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad