Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10229 (ALL)

VINOD CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/21978/2026 · 2026-09-27

Devendra Singh I, Rajiv Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21978 of 2026 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, during investigation, certain graver sections has further been added. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid fact but states that he does not intend to press the petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to file fresh with better particulars. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 5. Certified copy of the relevant documents be returned to the counsel for the petitioner as per Rules. September 28, 2026 Sanjeet Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Yadav, Veer Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Vinod Chauhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad