Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10227 (ALL)

RAMAN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLR/5989/2026 · 2026-09-30

Sanjiv Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5989 of 2026 Court No. - 88 HON'BLE SANJIV KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Ms. Shweta Nishad, learned Counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A on behalf of the State. 2. At the stage of admission of this revision, learned Counsel for the revisionist submits that she does not want to press this revision and wants to withdraw it. 3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the revisionist. 4. In view of the above, the instant revision is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Certified copies of the documents be returned to learned Counsel for the revisionist, as per rules. October 1, 2026 AdityaG Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Shweta Nishad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sanjiv Kumar,J.) Raman Kumar .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ADITYA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad